The National Post today reports on new rules in the citizenship process that may render children – adopted by Canadians or born to Canadians outside of Canadian soil – as less than full-Canadian citizens. Read the story here.
The Fraser Institute interprets this as a way to protect Canada from ‘citizens of convenience’: As quoted in the Jan 16/09 National Post story: “If you’re going to be a Canadian, you have to have some substantive ties. If you keep giving citizenship on indefinitely to your progeny and their progeny, the ties are pretty questionable.”
Category: Federal
-
Canadians of convenience
-
Gender-based barriers to settlement and integration for live-in caregivers: A review of the literature
The Ontario Metropolis Centre/the Joint Centre of Excellence for Research in Immigration Studies (CERIS) has released a literature review on barriers to integration and settlement for live-in caregivers.
Authors Denise L. Spitzer and Sara Torres ask what is known about the women who migrate to Canada under the federal live-in caregiver program and the barriers they face in settling and integrating in a new community. The paper provides historical, economic and demographic information and concludes with several policy recommendations. -
2009 immigration levels for Canada
The office of the Honourable Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism has released news on the immigration levels planned for 2009.
Backgrounders to the news release include information on the ministerial instructions for visa officers to assist them in identifying applications that may be given priority consideration.
‘Live-in caregivers’ continue to be listed as economic-class priorities.
From the backgrounder, this information on family-class applications:“Family class applications will be processed in the same manner and with the same priorities as usual. Specifically, applications for sponsored spouses, partners and dependent children shall continue to be placed into processing immediately upon receipt”.
Read the full ministerial instructions, as they appear in the Canada Gazette.
-
Speech from the Throne ~ Canada's 40th Parliament begins
Yesterday, the Governonr Genenral delivered the Speech from the Throne, opening Canada’s 40th Parliament. In the SFT, a commitment to work to “increase the uptake of immigrant settlement programs” in the provinces. With regard to children, the SFT included an intention to increase the child care allowance and improve maternity and parental leave policies and benefits.
Full test of the Speech from the Throne in html and PDF. -
New federal cabinet
The Governor General has sworn in the next cabinet for the 40th Parliament. Of interest to immigrantchildren.ca readers, these posts:
For Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism: The Honourable Jason Kenney, former Minister of State (Multiculturalism and Canadian Identity)
For Human Resources and Social Development: The Honourable Diane Finley, former Minister of Citizenship and Immigration.immigrantchildren.ca will update the blog, revising any relevant pages over the next little while.
-
Oct 13-19 is Citizenship Week
Citizenship Week is held the 3rd week of October every year. Several activities and resources on the Citizenship and Immigration Canada website here. Some interesting facts:
· Canada became the first Commonwealth country to gain its own citizenship act in 1947
· Before 1947, Canadians were considered British Subjects
· Prime Minister at the time, William Lyon Mackenzie King became the first Canadian citizen
· Each year approximately 160,000 people become Canadian citizens
· The 2001 census says about 84% of eligible immigrants are Canadian citizens.
Let’s take the ocassion to review the Oath of Citizenship:
I swear/affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.
immigrantchildren.ca invites you to revisit the FInal Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights, Children: The Silenced Citizens. Effective Implementation of Canada’s International Obligations with respect to the Rights of Children.
-
Oct 6-12 is National Family Week
The Canadian Association of Family Resource Programs (FRP) sponsors National Family Week. This year’s theme is Strengthening Ties Through Family Traditions. Visit the FRP website for information and resources.
-
An important message from CCICY
An important message from the Canadian Coalition for Immigrant Children and Youth (from Barbara Burnaby)
Dear CCICY Members:
As the federal election approaches, there are several immigration issues that candidates should be addressing. Please see the information below for an overview of the issues and some ideas for questions to adk your candidates.
Immediate Action Urgently Needed for Immigrant Children and Youth:– greatly extended federal funding for settlement programs for immigrant young people;
– federal initiatives for coordinated and collaborative action with provincial governments regarding education issues for immigrant children and youth.
– immigrant children and youth are a rapidly growing group with major barriers to their integrating into Canadian society as a result of: gaps in education, family poverty, poor prospects for employment, and discrimination in the community. The social, economic and political consequences of ignoring the needs of immigrant children and youth creates risks, on the one hand, of foregoing their potential contribution to this country and, on the other, of allowing the growth of a sizeable group of distressed and disaffected citizens.What Needs to be done for Immigrant Children and Youth?
– action on identified, needed services;
– stop using the constitutional separation of powers of federal government (immigration) and provincial governments (education, social services) as an excuse for not coordinating services;
– deal with systematic resistance to needed forms of integrative services and send clear messages about the vital role of immigration to the future prosperity of Canada;
– turn around the trend that has sacrificed services for immigrant children and youth to the short-sighted belt-tightening fiscal policies of the last decade;
– increase service sector knowledge about the crisis for immigrant children and youth and expand the research that back this up – NOW.Questions for Candidates:
Literacy & Language
All objective measures show that newcomer children learn English better and faster when they are also supported in retaining their home language. Work with immigrant families shows that the home language often takes second place and, as a result, these languages are forgotten and lost. What would your party do to support early childhood educators and elementary school teachers in promoting the use of home languages in family homes and in early learning and child care settings?
Early Learning & Child Care
Over 20 years of evidence-based research tells us that children benefit from high quality early childhood care and education and that families benefit from being supported in their role as parents. For newcomer families, the local child care centre is often the first point of entry to the community and serves as an important support. The Liberal Party puts child care on the agenda every election and yet fails to implement the pan-Canadian child care system needed. The Conservative Party thinks child care comes in the mail. What would your party do to support and promote early learning and child care for all families?
Bill C-50
Immigrant serving organizations were unanimous in decrying the changes to Canadian immigration policy as introduced and passed in the budget bill, Bill C-50. For the Conservative Party: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration recently conducted a cross-Canada consultation seeking input on how to implement the proposed changes in Bill C-50. What kinds of explicit instructions can Canadians expect with regard to protecting the family reunification aspect of our immigration policy? For the Liberal Party: How does your party justify its lack of action on Bill C-50? For all other parties: What would your party do to ensure family reunification remains a central component in our immigration policy?
Political Representation
What has your party done and what will it do to increase immigrant/newcomer representation? How many visible-minority candidates is your party running in this election?
-
The Liberal Party immigration plan
<An update for my blog visitors, Jan 24, 2010: From the stats, I see there are many visitors to the blog looking for the “Liberal party immigration plan”. I’ve been searching for some time now and even sent an email to the federal Liberal party last fall to inquire. I have had no response. Once I find it/get a response, I’ll be sure to update the blog here and on the main site (as well as through my twitter account)>.
~
“Immigration: Welcoming New Canadians for a successful Canada”, the Liberals plan for immigration, was released today and is also referred to in our ELECTION ~ Fall ’08 page.
The Liberals appear to be taking the same tact as the Conservatives. Maybe that’s why they didn’t vote against Bill C-50? Seems to be agreement that Canada needs certain types of immigrants to meet Canada’s labour needs. Sound familiar?
Also, no mention of the family reunification aspect of our immigration policy. Here’s what is said:“We need to reduce the current backlog, modernize our immigration system, and help new Canadians succeed once they are here. The result will be a stronger economy and a fairer country”.
This indeed sounds familiar. Here’s what the Conservative government said about the changes to immigration policy embedded in Bill C-50 (which the Liberals did not vote against):
“The changes aim to modernize Canada’s immigration system and shorten the time it takes to immigrate to Canada….The legislative amendments, combined with the 2008 budget funding, are necessary to better manage applications, to be more responsive to the labour market…”.
-
CCR questions for federal candidates
The Canadian Council on Refugees has posted a fact sheet and series of questions for political parties and candidates on immigration and refugee issues for the upcoming 2008 federal election. Questions specifically related to children and families include the following: See the ELECTION ~ Fall ’08 page (to the right) for more questions for candidates and parties.
TRAFFICKING: Will you support the Canadian Council for Refugees’ proposal for legislative amendment to protect trafficked persons in Canada?
Background: Currently, immigration legislation provides no specific measures to protect trafficked persons. This means that trafficked persons, after being abused and exploited by their traffickers, may be simply detained and deported by the Canadian authorities. For example, this summer an 11-year-old girl, who was a suspected victim of trafficking, was detained for over a month by Canadian immigration authorities.
The Canadian Council for Refugees has developed a proposal to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act in order to provide temporary and permanent protection to trafficked persons.REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT: Will you support an increase in the numbers of refugees resettled to Canada (including Iraqi refugees)?
Background: The UN Refugee Agency has recently estimated the number of refugees in need of resettlement at 560,000, a huge increase over previous years. The Iraqi crisis has led to two million refugees fleeing to neighbouring countries. Canada has not responded in any significant way to this crisis, unlike similar situations in the past where Canada has responded with special resettlement efforts.
Meanwhile Canada is resettling significantly fewer refugees today than we were in the 1990s (average annual in 90’s: 14,600; average annual 2000-2007: 10,600).
For more information, see Iraqi refugee crisis: Call for increased Canadian response, Dec 2007.FAMILY REUNIFICATION: How will you make family reunification a priority and ensure that children are quickly reunited with their parents?
Background: In recent years, the immigration program has been increasingly oriented towards economic immigration, at the expense of family reunification. Refugee families in particular face extremely long processing times: in some visa posts, families routinely wait more than a year and a half for reunification – this includes children that are separated from both their parents. There are also barriers: for example, separated children in Canada have no right in law to reunite with their parents.
The CCR has developed a Manifesto on Family Reunification, calling for an immigration and refugee system that respects basic rights by favouring the speedy reunification of families. It calls in particular for the processing of family members of refugees, especially separated children, to be done in Canada.